FaithLockFaithLock
Bible Study16 min readUpdated Aug 2026

Bible Study on Ephesians

Summary

Authorship, and this one is close to evenly split. The letter claims Paul as its author in its opening line. Whether he wrote it is one of the most contested authorship questions in the New Testament, and the numbers are worth stating precisely because summaries usually pick a side.

Ephesians is the New Testament letter with the widest gap between how it reads and how much scholars argue about it. The text itself is serene: long, rolling sentences about grace, unity, and a plan formed before the creation of the world, followed by practical instruction on how a mixed community should actually live. Almost nothing in it is polemical.

Behind that calm surface sit two genuine puzzles that any honest study has to name: who wrote it, and who it was written to. This guide covers both, along with the structure, seven key passages, and a four-week plan.

Background: What We Know and What Is Debated

Authorship, and this one is close to evenly split. The letter claims Paul as its author in its opening line. Whether he wrote it is one of the most contested authorship questions in the New Testament, and the numbers are worth stating precisely because summaries usually pick a side.

Harold Hoehner surveyed 279 commentaries and found roughly 54% favoring Pauline authorship, 39% rejecting it, and 7% undecided. A survey taken at the 2011 British New Testament Conference found 39 scholars supporting authenticity, 42 rejecting it, and 28 undecided. Raymond Brown, writing from within critical scholarship, estimated that about 80% of critical scholars judge that Paul did not write it. These figures are not contradictory: they are counting different populations, with Hoehner's commentary survey including a large body of conservative scholarship and Brown describing the critical guild specifically.

The arguments against Pauline authorship rest on vocabulary, sentence structure that is unusually long and layered even for Paul, and an eschatology that reads as more settled and less imminent than in the undisputed letters. Defenders answer that a letter written late, in prison, in a reflective mode, with a different secretary, could plausibly differ. Whatever you conclude, "Paul wrote Ephesians" and "Paul did not write Ephesians" are both positions held by large numbers of serious scholars, and a study Bible that presents either as settled is overstating.

Date, which follows. If Paul wrote it, the usual date is around AD 62, during a Roman imprisonment, alongside Colossians and Philemon. If it is deutero-Pauline, meaning written by a follower in Paul's name and tradition, scholars generally place it between AD 70 and 100.

Who received it, and this is a textual problem rather than a theory. The words "in Ephesus" in 1:1 are absent from the earliest and best manuscripts. That absence, combined with the letter's striking lack of personal greetings, is difficult to reconcile with Ephesus specifically. Paul spent about three years there according to Acts, and his farewell to the Ephesian elders in Acts 20 is one of the most personal scenes in the book. A letter to that church with no names in it is odd.

The widely held explanation is that Ephesians was a circular letter, written to be carried to several congregations in the region, with the destination left blank or filled in locally. Bart Ehrman treats the phrase as a later insertion. If the circular-letter view is right, the generality that makes Ephesians feel abstract is a design feature.

Its close relative. Ephesians overlaps substantially with Colossians in structure, vocabulary, and sequence of topics. Any account of Ephesians has to explain that relationship, and it is one of the main pieces of evidence in the authorship argument on both sides.

The Central Claim

God had a plan before creation, it is being executed now, and the visible proof of it is a community in which two groups who had every reason to stay separate are one body.

The first three chapters argue this. The last three describe what it looks like when a household, a workplace, and a congregation take it seriously.

How the Letter Is Laid Out

The structure is unusually clean, and knowing it makes the letter much easier to hold:

Chapters 1-3, what is true. A single enormous sentence of praise in the Greek of 1:3-14, a prayer, the movement from death to life in chapter 2, the abolition of the barrier between Jew and Gentile in 2:11-22, Paul's role in the mystery in chapter 3, and a second prayer.

Chapters 4-6, what follows. Unity and gifts, the old self and new self, specific instructions about speech, anger, and theft, the household code covering wives and husbands, children and parents, slaves and masters, and finally the armor of God.

The hinge is 4:1: "As a prisoner for the Lord, then, I urge you to live a life worthy of the calling you have received." Everything before that verse is indicative; everything after is imperative. The word "then" is doing the structural work of the whole letter.

Seven Key Passages

Ephesians 1:3-6, on the plan that predates you

"Praise be to the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us in the heavenly realms with every spiritual blessing in Christ. For he chose us in him before the creation of the world to be holy and blameless in his sight. In love he predestined us for adoption to sonship through Jesus Christ, in accordance with his pleasure and will—to the praise of his glorious grace, which he has freely given us in the One he loves." (Ephesians 1:3-6, NIV)

In Greek, verses 3 through 14 are one continuous sentence, one of the longest in the New Testament. Translations break it up because English cannot carry it, but the effect in the original is a single unbroken breath of praise that keeps adding clauses because the writer will not stop.

"Before the creation of the world" sets the timeline. Whatever you conclude about predestination as a doctrine, the letter's rhetorical point is that the reader arrived late to a plan already underway. This is the opposite of a religion organized around your decisions.

Note also that the passage is framed as praise, not as doctrine. It is a benediction, and reading it as a proof text for a system of election flattens the genre.

Ephesians 2:1-3, on the diagnosis

"As for you, you were dead in your transgressions and sins, in which you used to live when you followed the ways of this world and of the ruler of the kingdom of the air, the spirit who is now at work in those who are disobedient. All of us also lived among them at one time, gratifying the cravings of our flesh and following its desires and thoughts. Like the rest, we were by nature deserving of wrath." (Ephesians 2:1-3, NIV)

The word is "dead," not sick or lost. That choice determines everything that follows, because a dead person cannot cooperate with a rescue. The verbs in verses 4 and 5 all have God as their subject for exactly this reason.

"You used to live" and "we were" is a pattern worth tracking through the whole letter. Ephesians repeatedly puts the reader's former condition in the past tense and then builds instructions on top of the change. The ethics of chapters 4 through 6 only make sense as the behavior of people who have already been moved.

Ephesians 2:8-10, on grace and what it produces

"For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God—not by works, so that no one can boast. For we are God's handiwork, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do." (Ephesians 2:8-10, NIV)

Verses 8 and 9 are among the most quoted in the New Testament. Verse 10 is almost always left off, and leaving it off produces a distortion. The passage does not say works are irrelevant; it says works are the output rather than the input. You are not saved by them, and you are made for them.

"God's handiwork" translates a word from which we get "poem." The claim is that the person is the made thing, not the maker.

The relationship between this passage and James 2 is one of the most useful comparisons in the New Testament, and reading them side by side clarifies both.

Ephesians 2:14-16, on the wall

The section from 2:11 to 2:22 is the theological center of the letter and the part most often skipped in favor of 2:8-9. Paul, or whoever wrote it, describes a barrier between Jew and Gentile that Christ destroyed, creating "one new humanity" out of two.

The image would have been concrete to any first-century reader. The Jerusalem temple had a physical partition beyond which Gentiles could not pass, with inscriptions warning that the penalty for crossing was death. Two of those inscriptions have been recovered by archaeologists. When this letter says the dividing wall of hostility has been demolished, the readers had a specific wall in mind.

This is why unity is not a soft theme in Ephesians. It is the demonstration that the plan worked.

Ephesians 4:1-3, on the effort unity requires

"As a prisoner for the Lord, then, I urge you to live a life worthy of the calling you have received. Be completely humble and gentle; be patient, bearing with one another in love. Make every effort to keep the unity of the Spirit through the bond of peace." (Ephesians 4:1-3, NIV)

"Keep" is the key verb, not "create." The unity already exists as a fact established in chapter 2. What the readers are asked to do is maintain it, which is a lower claim and a harder job.

"Make every effort" is not the language of something that happens naturally. The letter that spends three chapters saying the wall is down then spends the fourth admitting that people will rebuild it out of ordinary irritation unless they work at it.

Ephesians 4:22-24, on the change of clothes

"You were taught, with regard to your former way of life, to put off your old self, which is being corrupted by its deceitful desires; to be made new in the attitude of your minds; and to put on the new self, created to be like God in true righteousness and holiness." (Ephesians 4:22-24, NIV)

Three verbs in sequence: put off, be made new, put on. The middle one is passive, which is easy to miss and important. You do the taking off and the putting on. The renewal in between is done to you.

"Deceitful desires" names the mechanism accurately. The old self is not maintained by conviction but by wanting, and the wanting lies about what it will deliver. This is why the letter locates renewal in "the attitude of your minds" rather than in effort alone.

Ephesians 6:10-12, on who the fight is with

"Finally, be strong in the Lord and in his mighty power. Put on the full armor of God, so that you can take your stand against the devil's schemes. For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms." (Ephesians 6:10-12, NIV)

The armor passage is usually read individually, as personal equipment. The verbs in the Greek are plural throughout. This is a unit being told to hold a line together, which fits a letter whose main subject is one body.

"Not against flesh and blood" is a redirection with immediate practical force. The letter has just finished six chapters on how believers should treat each other, and it closes by saying the actual opponent is not the person across the room. Most conflicts inside a congregation are resolved or inflamed by which of those two things people believe.

The Questions Ephesians Puts to a Reader Today

Are you living as though the plan started with you? The first chapter places the reader inside something that predates creation. That is a demotion in importance and a promotion in security, and many people would prefer the reverse.

Which wall are you keeping standing? Ephesians 2 makes the collapse of an ethnic and religious barrier the proof that the gospel works. The equivalent barrier in your own congregation is probably not one anyone would defend out loud.

Do you know the difference between keeping unity and creating it? One is exhausting and one is available. Ephesians 4:3 says the first.

Who do you think you are actually fighting? The armor passage answers this, and the answer changes the tone of nearly every argument.

How to Study Ephesians in Four Weeks

Week 1: Chapter 1. Read 1:3-14 out loud in one breath, or as close as you can manage, to feel what the single Greek sentence does. Then track every occurrence of "in Christ," "in him," and "in the One he loves" through the chapter. The phrase appears with unusual density and it is the letter's spine.

Week 2: Chapters 2 and 3. The movement from death to life, then the wall. Give 2:11-22 at least as much time as you give 2:8-10, since the letter clearly considers it the bigger claim. Read Paul's prayer at the end of chapter 3 slowly; it is one of the most expansive prayers in the New Testament.

Week 3: Chapters 4 and 5. Unity, gifts, and the practical instruction on speech, anger, and theft. Read 4:25-32 as a list and note how concrete it is: stop lying, deal with anger before the day ends, stop stealing and work so you have something to give away. This is not abstract.

The household code in 5:21-6:9 is the section modern readers find hardest, and it should not be handled quickly. Note that it opens with mutual submission in 5:21 and that it addresses wives, children, and enslaved people directly, as moral agents, which was not the norm in comparable Greco-Roman household codes.

Week 4: Chapter 6. The armor. Read it as instructions to a group rather than an individual and see how it changes. Then read the whole letter straight through one final time; it takes about twenty-five minutes, and the structure will be visible in a way it was not on day one.

Discussion Questions for a Group

  1. Ephesians 1:3-14 is a single sentence in Greek that keeps adding clauses. What does the form of that passage tell you about what the writer was doing, and does it change how you read the content?
  2. Ephesians 2:8-9 is quoted constantly and 2:10 rarely. What distortion results from stopping at verse 9?
  3. The letter treats the collapse of the Jew and Gentile barrier as the demonstration that the gospel is real. What would the equivalent demonstration look like in your context?
  4. Ephesians 4:3 says to keep unity, not to build it. How does that change what you think you are responsible for in a conflict?
  5. The household code in 5:21-6:9 has been used in ways that harmed people. How do you read it responsibly, and what does 5:21 do to the passage that follows?
  6. The armor of God is addressed to a group in the Greek. What does the passage look like when you read it as instructions to a church rather than to an individual?

Finding the Hours

Ephesians is built out of long sentences, and long sentences do not survive interruption. The single Greek sentence behind 1:3-14 is the clearest case: read it in fragments across three days and you will get the words and lose the effect entirely.

A study like this needs twenty-five uninterrupted minutes a few times a week, which is a smaller ask than many people think and a harder one to actually get. If your phone is the thing that keeps splitting the block, FaithLock is designed for that on iPhone. It blocks distracting apps using Apple's Screen Time technology, and when you reach for one it shows a verse from the complete BSB library of 31,000+ verses and asks a short question about it before letting the app open, so the reach becomes a choice. Download FaithLock on the App Store if protecting a reading block is the practical problem.

Frequently Asked Questions

Did Paul write Ephesians?

This is genuinely contested. A survey of 279 commentaries found about 54% favoring Pauline authorship and 39% against, while a 2011 British New Testament Conference survey found slightly more scholars against than for, and Raymond Brown estimated that around 80% of critical scholars reject it. Arguments against center on vocabulary, sentence structure, and eschatology. Anyone who tells you this is settled in either direction is not describing the field accurately.

Was Ephesians actually written to Ephesus?

The phrase "in Ephesus" is missing from the earliest manuscripts of 1:1, and the letter contains no personal greetings despite Paul having spent roughly three years in that city according to Acts. The most common explanation is that it was a circular letter intended for several congregations in the region, with the destination left open.

What is the main message of Ephesians?

That God formed a plan before creation, executed it in Christ, and demonstrates it through a unified community made of groups that were previously divided. Chapters 1 through 3 state what is true; chapters 4 through 6 describe the behavior that follows from it.

What is the armor of God in Ephesians 6?

Six items: the belt of truth, the breastplate of righteousness, feet fitted with readiness from the gospel of peace, the shield of faith, the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which the text identifies as the word of God. The verbs are plural in Greek, so the passage addresses a community holding a position together rather than an individual arming alone.

How long does it take to read Ephesians?

Six chapters, about twenty-five minutes read straight through. Because so much of the letter depends on very long sentences, reading it whole is worth more here than in most New Testament books.

Related Reading


Scripture quotations from the New International Version via BibleGateway. Historical background and authorship survey figures drawn from standard reference scholarship on Ephesians.

Start building a daily Scripture habit

Join Christians replacing scrolling with Scripture.

Try FaithLock Free